ੴSikh History

Life and times

Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji

Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji was the tenth Sikh Guru. Born at Patna on 22 December 1666, Guru Ji succeeded after the martyrdom of Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji in 1675, created the Khalsa at Anandpur in 1699, fought the hill rajas and Mughal forces, lost all four sons and Mata Gujri in the winter of 1705, and passed away at Nanded on 7 October 1708, ending the line of personal Gurus.

The record is richer than for any earlier Guru. There are Guru Ji's own poems, including the autobiographical Bachitra Natak and the Zafarnamah to Aurangzeb. There are dated hukamnamas, Persian court papers, and a near-contemporary poem by a court poet, Sainapati's Sri Gur Sobha.

Even so, the best-known scenes often come from later on. The five heads of 1699 first appear in detail in a work of 1751, and the story of Mai Bhago is absent from the Sainapati passages read for this page. This page therefore keeps the older and later layers apart, and gives conflicting dates as the sources do, including the 12 and 13 December 1705 dates for the execution of the younger sons.

Dates, family and related people →

The times

Aurangzeb and the Deccan

Aurangzeb ruled from 1658 to 1707. The Encyclopaedia describes the second half of the reign as a long and fruitless attempt to conquer the Deccan. He also issued measures against non-Muslims in 1669 and 1679. With the emperor far away, Punjab affairs fell to governors at Lahore and to the faujdar of Sirhind, Wazir Khan, and they often worked with the hill rajas.

After Nadaun, the Encyclopaedia says, the emperor told his officers in the Punjab to stop Guru Ji holding assemblies. Prince Muazzam, the future Bahadur Shah, was sent to the northwest. The entries date this to 1694 and to 13 July 1696, a difference they leave unresolved.[EoS][EoS][EoS]

The Shivalik states

The Rajput hill states were tributaries of the Mughals and rivals of one another. Kahlur, or Bilaspur, held the land on which Anandpur stood. Its ruler Bhim Chand, from 1665 to 1692, resented Guru Ji's state and following. His son Ajmer Chand took up the quarrel with more force. Sirmaur under Medini Prakash was friendly, and Garhwal under Fateh Shah joined the attack at Bhangani.

The Encyclopaedia says the chiefs also objected to the mingling of castes in the Sikh order, and it says the hills had neglected their tribute, which is what brought a Mughal force to Nadaun. Alliances changed fast: the enemy of 1688 was Guru Ji's ally in 1691.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS]

The succession war of 1707

After Aurangzeb's death on 20 February 1707, his son Azam Shah took the throne, and Muazzam came down from Kabul and defeated him at Jajau near Agra on 8 June 1707, becoming Bahadur Shah. The Encyclopaedia says Guru Ji sent a contingent of Sikhs to fight on his side. Sri Gur Sobha gives a chapter to this war, and a further one to Guru Ji's meeting with the new emperor.[EoS][Src][EoS]

Bahadur Shah after Guru Ji

Bahadur Shah had a liberal reputation. After Guru Ji passed away he faced Banda Singh's rising in the Punjab, and on 10 December 1710 he issued a general order to kill the followers of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji wherever found. He passed away at Lahore on 27 February 1712. The throne changed hands eight times between 1707 and 1720, the Encyclopaedia says.[EoS][EoS][EoS]

Show

Patna and the road to the Punjab

1666-1675

Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji was born at Patna, with the name Gobind Rai, on 22 December 1666, or Poh sudi 7, 1723 Bikrami, while Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji was in the east. Takht Sri Harimandar Sahib now stands at the house. The family left when Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji called them from Patna in 1670, and Lakhnaur was reached on 13 September 1670, according to the Encyclopaedia's entry on Mata Gujri.

Mata Gujri's brother Kirpal Chand acted as escort, and later as a guardian. The Encyclopaedia says Guru Ji's education at Anandpur covered Punjabi, Braj, Sanskrit and Persian.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS]

Agreed in tradition22 December 1666Patna

Birth at Patna

The birth took place while the father was further east, and the date is given in the Bikrami calendar as Poh sudi 7, 1723.

Note. The site's person page also records an older year, 1661, and a Nanakshahi commemoration date. Those were not treated in the entries read for this page.

What the sources say (3)
  • Later traditionGives the Bikrami and Common Era dates and the place.[EoS]
  • Later traditionGives the same date and says the family had been left at Patna.[EoS]
  • Later traditionIdentifies the site, once the house of the jeweller Salas Rai, as Takht Sri Harimandar Sahib.[EoS]
Disputed1671-1672Lakhnaur and Chakk Nanaki

The arrival at Chakk Nanaki

Guru Ji reached the settlement in March 1672 on one account, with an alternative of 1671.

Note. Compare the same difference on the page of Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji.

What the sources say (2)
  • ScholarshipSays Guru Ji reached Chakk Nanaki in March 1672.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipImplies an earlier arrival, as Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji rejoined the family there in March 1671.[EoS]

Early years at Anandpur

1675-1685

The sacred head of Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji reached Anandpur in November 1675, and Guru Ji, aged nine, performed the rites. The formal installation is dated to Vaisakhi of 1733 Bikrami, 29 March 1676. Mata Gujri and Kirpal Chand managed affairs at first.

Marriage to Sundari is dated to 4 April 1684. Mata Sundari gave birth to Ajit Singh at Paonta in January 1687. Jujhar Singh, Zorawar Singh and Fateh Singh were born to Mata Jito in 1691, 1696 and 1699. Sahib Devan's marriage to Guru Ji is dated to 15 April 1700. She is honoured in tradition as mother of the Khalsa.

Chandi di Var, Guru Ji's one long work in Punjabi, is dated to 1684 by the Encyclopaedia. Bhim Chand of Kahlur grew unhappy at Guru Ji's kingly style.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS]

Agreed in traditionNovember 1675Anandpur

The Ranghreta is Guru Ji's son

Bhai Jaita arrived with the head, and Guru Ji is remembered as honouring him despite his low caste.

The Encyclopaedia, drawing on Sikh tradition, says Bhai Jaita walked from Delhi to Anandpur carrying the head of Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji, after every other Sikh in the city had kept away for fear of reprisals. He belonged to a caste others looked down upon. Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji, still a boy of nine, received him and declared that the Ranghreta was Guru Ji's own son. Bhai Jaita stayed on, became the drummer of the Ranjit Nagara, and took the name Jiwan Singh when the Khalsa was created.

Read this story

Note. The words are remembered in tradition. They have not been traced to an early text.

What the sources say (3)
  • Later traditionGives the epithet and says Bhai Jaita, later Jiwan Singh, was of the scavenger caste.[EoS]
  • Later traditionSays Guru Ji received and cremated the head brought at great personal risk.[EoS]
  • Later traditionDates the rites to 16 November 1675.[EoS]

Paonta and Bhangani

1685-1688

Medini Prakash of Sirmaur invited Guru Ji to Nahan in April 1685, partly as a way of avoiding trouble with Bhim Chand. Guru Ji's party neared Nahan on 14 April and afterwards settled at Paonta on the Yamuna, founded, by one entry, in November 1685 and, by another, around April. For three years poets worked here. The Encyclopaedia speaks of fifty-two in Guru Ji's employ, who translated old classics into the common language. It calls these the most creative years of Guru Ji's life. Ram Rai met Guru Ji here shortly before his passing in 1687.

Bhangani ended this period. Guru Ji returned to Anandpur later in 1688 and began to fortify it, with a ring of forts.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS]

Well attested18 September 1688Bhangani, on the Yamuna

The battle of Bhangani

A coalition of hill rajas attacked and was beaten, and Guru Ji wrote of the battle personally.

Note. The ruler of Garhwal is Fateh Shah in the Bachitra Natak and in his own entry, and Fateh Chand in two others. Sukkha Singh's account blames Bhim Chand's scheming at Garhwal.

What the sources say (4)
  • From the timeReports the poem as saying Fateh Shah attacked without provocation and was defeated with his allies.[EoS]
  • From the timeDevotes a chapter to the stay at Paonta and to the battle. (ch. II)[Src]
  • ScholarshipGives 18 September 1688 and describes Guru Ji forestalling the attack and choosing the ground.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipGives 8 September 1688, and notes 15 April 1688 in some sources.[EoS]
Agreed in tradition1688Bhangani and Sadhaura

Pir Buddhu Shah at Bhangani

When most of his hired Pathans deserted, a Muslim saint brought his own followers and lost two sons fighting for Guru Ji.

The Encyclopaedia tells it this way. Pir Buddhu Shah of Sadhaura, whose real name was Badr ud-Din, called on Guru Ji at Paonta in 1685 and recommended five hundred Pathan soldiers under four leaders. When the hill chiefs came in 1688, all the Pathans left except Kale Khan and his men, and went over to the attackers.

Guru Ji sent word to the Pir. He arrived at Bhangani with seven hundred followers, along with his brother and four sons. Many fell, including two of his sons and the brother.

After the battle Guru Ji offered rich gifts, which the Pir turned down. As the tradition has it, he asked instead for the comb from Guru Ji's hair and the turban Guru Ji was about to tie on. These, with a small kirpan, stayed with his family for generations. He paid a price in the end: a local official, on orders from Sirhind, seized and executed him in 1704.

Read this story

Note. The comb and turban were said to be kept in the family until passing to Nabha, a tangible memory, but not a proof of the details. The Encyclopaedia says the Pir was executed on 21 March 1704.

What the sources say (3)
  • Later traditionTells the story, with 700 followers, the two sons and a brother lost, and the gift of comb and turban.[EoS]
  • Later traditionIntroduces Budhu Shah, a Saiyid of Sadhaura, as visiting Guru Ji with disciples and seeking pardon.[Macauliffe]
  • Later traditionSays Guru Ji gave relics to Pir Buddhu Shah for his service in the battle.[EoS]

The hills and the empire

1688-1698

Bhim Chand made peace after Bhangani, and in 1691 he asked for Guru Ji's help. Alif Khan had been sent from Jammu to collect arrears from the hill chiefs. At Nadaun on the Beas, Guru Ji's Sikhs stood with Bhim Chand and the other chiefs. The poem says the enemy was driven into the river.

More fighting followed: under Dilawar Khan's son, then against Husain Khan, who was killed on 20 February 1696. The Bachitra Natak's narrative stops at about this time. In 1692 Ajmer Chand succeeded Bhim Chand, who is said to have passed away that September.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS]

Well attested20 March 1691Nadaun, on the Beas

The battle of Nadaun

Guru Ji fought alongside Bhim Chand against a Mughal force demanding tribute.

Note. The Encyclopaedia gives the Bikrami date as 22 Chet 1747. It calls Alif Khan a commander sent by the governor of Jammu.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeReports the poem as saying Alif Khan was defeated and that the former enemy Bhim Chand asked for help.[EoS]
  • From the timeDevotes a chapter to this battle. (ch. III)[Src]
  • ScholarshipGives the date as 20 March 1691, with Kirpal Chand of Kangra and Raja Dyal on the Mughal side.[EoS]
Well attested1690s, with Husain Khan on 20 February 1696Near Anandpur

Khanzada and Husain Khan

Mughal detachments were repulsed, partly because chiefs and commanders fought among themselves.

Note. The Bachitra Natak suggests other hill chiefs drew Husain away, a less direct picture than decisive victory.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeReports that Dilawar Khan's son turned back on hearing the Sikhs and that Husain's expedition ended with his death in fighting with other chiefs.[EoS]
  • From the timeDevotes a chapter to the battles with Khanzada and Husain Khan. (ch. IV)[Src]
  • ScholarshipDates the Husaini battle to 20 February 1696 and calls it a decisive Sikh victory.[EoS]

The Dasam Granth and its authorship

1680s onward, compiled later

Guru Ji's literary output was large. Jap, Akal Ustati, Chandi di Var, the Chandi Charitras, Chaubis Avatar and the Zafarnamah are all in the volume known as the Dasam Granth. The Encyclopaedia says the Gurus' earlier collection was kept apart, and reports from Kesar Singh Chhibber that Guru Ji refused in 1698 to have the two bound as one, calling the second a pastime only.

Many manuscripts were lost at the crossing of the Sarsa in December 1705. Bhai Mani Singh is credited with gathering what remained at Amritsar some two decades later, and later recensions followed.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS]

DisputedDebated since at least the 19th century

Who wrote the Dasam Granth?

Views range from the whole work being by Guru Ji, to its being partly or largely the work of court poets, with Charitropakhyan most in question.

Note. The authorship debate is live, and the site takes no side. Works generally cited as Guru Ji's own voice include the Bachitra Natak and the Zafarnamah. The Wikipedia item is a map of the debate, and specific scholars' arguments should be checked at source.

What the sources say (3)
  • ScholarshipConcedes that the authorship and authenticity of some writings in it are sometimes questioned, says it does not rank theologically with Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, and describes several variant recensions.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipCalls the complex of writings commonly attributed to Guru Ji, and treats the autobiographical poem as Guru Ji's own.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSets out traditional, partial and collective-authorship positions, the opposition arising in the Singh Sabha period, the standard edition from a committee set up in 1897, and doubts about a letter credited to Bhai Mani Singh.[Web]

The Khalsa, 1699

1698-1699

Complaints against the masands, the local agents who collected offerings, had been building. The Encyclopaedia says instructions went out in 1698 telling congregations to stop recognising them and to bring their offerings directly to Guru Ji. They were also told to come to Anandpur for Vaisakhi, on horseback where they could.

All sources agree that a new order was created at about this time, with initiation by the double-edged sword, a new name and a strict code. They differ about what happened on the day. The word khalsa itself was older: letters of Sri Guru Hargobind Ji and Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji use it for particular congregations. Sainapati gives the reason as Sikhs themselves explained it: with the deputies removed, every Sikh belonged directly to Guru Ji, as crown land belonged directly to the king.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][Src]

Well attested1698-1699Anandpur and congregations elsewhere

The masands are dismissed

Guru Ji ended the system of local deputies and took the Sikhs directly under Guru Ji.

Note. This is among the best-attested acts of Guru Ji's life, with both poem and letters behind it.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeSays Guru Ji did away with the masands and took all Sikhs to himself, and gives an edict on it. (ch. V, couplets 15, 32)[Src]
  • From the timeSays letters from 1699 onward tell Sikhs not to recognise masands and to bring offerings at Vaisakhi and Diwali.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipDescribes the institution, its corruption and its abolition, citing the poet Bhai Gurdas II.[EoS]
DisputedVaisakhi 1699, with other years in some sourcesAnandpur

Vaisakhi at Anandpur: the older and later accounts

Sainapati describes a great gathering and the creation of the Khalsa, without the call for heads, which first appears in detail in 1751.

The story most Sikhs know comes from Kuir Singh's Gurbilas Patshahi 10 of 1751, followed by Sukkha Singh and Santokh Singh. On Vaisakhi morning, after the service, Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji stood before the great gathering at Kesgarh with a drawn sword and asked for a Sikh who would give his head. The people fell silent. At the third call Daya Ram, a Khatri of Lahore, got up and followed Guru Ji into a tent.

Guru Ji came back with the sword dripping blood and asked again. Next to rise was Dharam Das, a Jat of Hastinapur, then Mohkam Chand of Dwarka, Himmat of Jagannath, and the barber Sahib Chand of Bidar. Macauliffe adds that people ran to complain to Guru Ji's mother that Guru Ji had lost his reason, and he says a goat was killed each time, a detail not in the Encyclopaedia's telling.

Then all five walked out alive, dressed alike in saffron robes, with swords at their sides. Guru Ji stirred water in an iron bowl with a double-edged sword while reciting scripture. Mata Jito added sugar crystals, and each man drank five palmfuls. These were the Panj Piare, the five beloved. Guru Ji then asked them to initiate Guru Ji in the same way, and took the name Singh.

Sainapati, who was close to Guru Ji, tells it far more simply. People gathered at Vaisakhi on the bank of the Sutlej. Guru Ji made the Khalsa known, and many joined while others grew anxious. He says nothing about heads or a tent, and gives his attention to what the Khalsa was to be.

Read this story

Note. The date also varies. The Encyclopaedia gives Vaisakhi 1756 Bikrami, 30 March 1699. The translator of Sri Gur Sobha gives March 20, 1699 in one note and heads the chapter with 1752 Bikrami, and notes that Kesar Singh Chhibber has 1755 and Bhangu 1752. Sainapati's silence does not prove the later story false, as he openly avoids events, but it shows the details cannot be traced to him. The tradition's account of the goats is not in the Encyclopaedia's version.

What the sources say (5)
  • From the timePlaces a great assembly at Anandpur at Vaisakhi, with many joining and others uneasy, and then the edict and initiation, without any call for heads or the five named Sikhs. (ch. V, couplets 1-6, 31-38)[Src]
  • Later traditionCalls Kuir Singh's work of 1751 the first to give details of the offering of heads, and says it wrongly dates the event to 1689.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays earlier chronicles do not narrate the episode in such detail and that Ratan Singh Bhangu says only that five were chosen from five castes.[EoS]
  • Later traditionTells the five heads scene with goats killed behind the tent walls. (pp. 91-93)[Macauliffe]
  • Later traditionTells the five heads story in its own account, dating it to 30 March 1699 and quoting Kuir Singh.[EoS]
Well attested1699 and afterAnandpur

The rules of the new order

Initiates were to give up shaving, tobacco and old rites of mourning, and to hold to Guru Ji's command.

Note. Sainapati gives a strong early witness to several rules, but the translator's list of five symbols is his own summary. The five k's in the Encyclopaedia belong to its later narrative, and they were not found as a set in the Sainapati couplets read here.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeLists keeping hair uncut even at a parent's death, abstaining from the hookah, avoiding those who broke the rules, and being initiated with the double-edged sword. (ch. V, couplets 31-38; ch. VII)[Src]
  • ScholarshipNames the five emblems beginning with k: uncut hair, comb, steel bracelet, short breeches and sword.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipAdds a ban on sex outside marriage and on meat from an animal slaughtered by the slow Muslim method.[EoS]
Single accountDated 1 Vaisakh, Sambat 1756 (1699), as reportedAnandpur

A Mughal newswriter on the Khalsa

Macauliffe, citing a Persian historian, gives a newswriter's report of Guru Ji telling the four castes to abandon their rules, with about twenty thousand men agreeing.

Macauliffe, citing a Persian historian he calls Ghulam Muhai ul Din, says a Mughal newswriter forwarded Guru Ji's address to the emperor. It told people to take up one creed and end religious differences. The four castes were to drop their separate rules and be brothers, eating from one dish without disgust.

The newswriter added his own note. Some Brahmins and Khatris said they would accept the teaching, while others refused to be told by a boy to give up the faith of their ancestors. Still, he says, some twenty thousand men rose and pledged obedience.

Read this story

Note. Both items go back to one citation. The original report was not seen, and the historian has not been securely identified. Macauliffe's wording of an address that rejects Hindu observances might be shaped by later concerns. The report is widely repeated, so it is shown here with this warning, not as a checked Mughal paper.

What the sources say (2)
  • Later traditionCredits the Persian historian Ghulam Muhai ul Din for the text of the address and the newswriter's own remarks on the crowd. (pp. 93-94)[Macauliffe]
  • ScholarshipRepeats the words and the figure of twenty thousand, citing Macauliffe for them. (pp. 115-116)[Banerjee]
Single account1699Anandpur

The sparrows and the nectar

A chronicler says Guru Ji set some of the initiation water aside, and sparrows that drank it fought each other to the death.

Note. Only Macauliffe was read for this, and he credits an unnamed chronicler. The site neither affirms nor denies it.

What the sources say (1)
  • Later traditionTells this and draws the moral that drinkers of the water would become warlike. (p. 94)[Macauliffe]

The Anandpur sieges

1700-1705

Anandpur's growth, and the Khalsa's challenge to caste, alarmed the hill rulers, led by Ajmer Chand. The Encyclopaedia gives attacks in 1700 and 1703 before the great siege of 1705. Sainapati covers these in chapters VIII to XI, combining some of them, according to his translator.

Mata Jito passed away on 5 December 1700. In spring 1701 Guru Ji started the martial Hola at Holgarh, an event now the town's largest festival. Guru Ji's journey to Kurukshetra brought a fight with two Mughal generals at Chamkaur on 15 January 1703, according to the entry on that town.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][Src][EoS]

Agreed in tradition1 September 1700Lohgarh fort, Anandpur

Bachitra Singh and the elephant

A Sikh on horseback drove back a drunken elephant sent to break a fort gate.

Kuir Singh's Gurbilas Patshahi 10 tells that the hill chiefs, unable to break into Anandpur, made an elephant drunk and sent it to batter down the gate of Lohgarh. Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji chose Bhai Bachitra Singh, one of five brothers given to Guru Ji's service by their father, to meet it.

He rode out and thrust his spear through the armour plate on the animal's forehead. The wounded beast turned and ran back through the attackers' own ranks, causing chaos. Bhai Bachitra Singh would later fall in the retreat of 1705.

Read this story

Note. Both go back to Kuir Singh, whose battle details the Encyclopaedia treats with caution. Sri Gur Sobha has a chapter on this first battle of Anandpur, but this detail was not checked in it.

What the sources say (2)
  • Later traditionCredits this to Gurbilas Patshahi 10 and dates it to 1 September 1700.[EoS]
  • Later traditionPlaces it at the Lohgarh fort during the hill chiefs' siege of 1700.[EoS]
Well attestedOctober 1700Near Kiratpur

Nirmohgarh

Outside Anandpur, Guru Ji was attacked by the chiefs and by Mughal troops with cannon, and broke out across the Sutlej.

Note. The entries add that the chiefs had first given an oath that Guru Ji could safely leave Anandpur, which foreshadows 1705.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeDevotes a chapter to the battle of Nirmohgarh. (ch. IX)[Src]
  • From the timeCites Bhatt Vahis for attacks on 7, 12 and 13 October 1700 and the crossing into Basohli on 14 October.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays Wazir Khan's contingent from Sirhind took part and used cannon.[EoS]
Well attestedMay to December 1705Anandpur

The great siege

Hill chiefs and Mughal forces from Lahore and Sirhind besieged the town until hunger brought talks.

Note. The site's person page speaks of a siege through 1704 and 1705, while these entries start it in May 1705.

What the sources say (4)
  • From the timeTells of the second battle of Anandpur, of hunger and desperate appeals from the townspeople and of written disclaimers by some Sikhs. (ch. XI-XII)[Src]
  • From the timeReports the poem as condemning the oath given and broken by the emperor and his officers. (verses 13-15)[EoS]
  • ScholarshipDates the start of the siege to Jeth 1762 Bikrami, May 1705.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays Ajmer Chand went to the emperor in winter 1704 to get the orders, and calls the safe-conduct a ruse of Wazir Khan.[EoS]
Well attestedNight of 5-6 December 1705Anandpur and the Sarsa

Leaving Anandpur

Guru Ji left under promises of safety, was attacked at once, and at the flooded Sarsa the family was scattered and manuscripts were lost.

Note. The Bhatt Vahis, as cited in the Encyclopaedia, say Bhai Jiwan Singh fell in the rearguard at the Sarsa, while Chamkaur's gurdwara honours him at that place.

What the sources say (4)
  • From the timeReports the letter as charging the emperor and officers with attacking after promising safe passage.[EoS]
  • From the timeTells of the departure and the fight at Shahi Tibbi near the Sirsa, with Udai Singh and companions holding back the enemy. (ch. XII)[Src]
  • ScholarshipGives Poh sudi 1, 1762 Bikrami, 5-6 December 1705, and the loss of baggage and most manuscripts.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays Bhai Mani Singh took Guru Ji's two wives to safety in Delhi.[EoS]

Chamkaur and Sirhind

December 1705

Guru Ji crossed the Sarsa with the two elder sons and about fifty Sikhs and reached Chamkaur on the evening of 6 December, with about forty men. Mata Gujri and the two younger sons were lost in the crossing. Within a week, all four sons and Mata Gujri were gone.

The Mughal record confirms the broad outline. A letter in the Ahkam-i-Alamgiri, quoted in the Encyclopaedia, reports Guru Ji besieged in a landholder's house at Chamkaur, two sons fallen, and Guru Ji's mother and another son captured.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS]

Well attested7 December 1705Chamkaur

The battle of Chamkaur

In a walled house, some forty Sikhs held off a far larger force for a day, and the two elder sons were martyred in sallies.

Sources tell the battle this way. Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji reached Chamkaur late on 6 December 1705. The elder landowner refused entry for fear of the rulers, but his brother Rup Chand let Guru Ji in. Eight Sikhs were posted on each side, with two more at the gate, and Guru Ji went to the upper floor with the two sons.

The Mughal force, grown with reinforcements, surrounded the house at dawn. The defenders had little ammunition, and when it ran out they went out in small parties to fight hand to hand. Sahibzada Ajit Singh led one group and fell. Sahibzada Jujhar Singh, then fourteen, led another and fell near the same spot. The Encyclopaedia quotes the Zafarnamah as describing forty set against a million.

Read this story

Note. Sainapati calls Ajit Singh by other names, and even shows a Zorawar Singh escaping, whom his translator takes to be a different person of the same name. The ages of the sons differ a little between entries.

What the sources say (4)
  • From the timeQuotes the imperial letter on the siege at Chamkaur and the killing of two sons.[EoS]
  • From the timeDescribes the fight and the two sons' deaths at length, with confusion over their names. (ch. XII)[Src]
  • ScholarshipSays the Sikhs ran out of ammunition and arrows and went out in batches of five, with this son leading the last sally.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipDescribes the house, the posts and the sallies through the day.[EoS]
Agreed in traditionNight of 7-8 December 1705Chamkaur

The five order Guru Ji to leave

Five survivors told Guru Ji to escape, and Guru Ji is said to have clapped and called out while slipping through the besiegers.

By nightfall only five Sikhs remained in the house with Guru Ji. They urged Guru Ji to go and rally the Sikhs again, and tradition makes this a command from the five acting as the Khalsa. Guru Ji handed over the clothes being worn to Bhai Sangat Singh, who looked somewhat similar, and left in the dark.

Three others also got out, Bhai Dharam Singh, Bhai Man Singh and Bhai Daya Singh, each going in a different direction by an arrangement to meet by the stars. Then, the gurdwara tradition says, Guru Ji did not want to steal away unannounced. On a low mound Guru Ji clapped and shouted that the Pir of Hind was leaving, and the three others called out from their positions, confusing the tired besiegers. In the morning Bhai Sangat Singh and Bhai Sant Singh fought to the last.

Read this story

Note. Sainapati's translator uses the name Sant Singh for the proxy, while the Encyclopaedia gives Sangat Singh that role with Sant Singh beside him. The shout and clap come through gurdwara tradition.

What the sources say (3)
  • Later traditionTells of the five urging escape, Sangat Singh taking Guru Ji's dress, and Gurdwara Tari Sahib marking the hand clap with the cry about the Pir of Hind.[EoS]
  • Later traditionDescribes the five as acting as a council and ordering Guru Ji to leave.[EoS]
  • From the timeSays Guru Ji left at the Khalsa's urging, and that a blow touched only a fingertip as Guru Ji escaped unseen. (ch. XII, couplets 71-72; translator's introduction)[Src]
Agreed in traditionDecember 1705Machhiwara to Hehran

Disguised as the Pir of Uchch

Two Pathan horse dealers carried Guru Ji in a palanquin, disguised as a Muslim holy man.

The Encyclopaedia says Ghani Khan and Nabi Khan were Pathans of Machhiwara who had sold horses at Anandpur and admired Guru Ji. Hearing that Guru Ji had come alone to Machhiwara after Chamkaur, they dressed Guru Ji in blue and carried Guru Ji in a palanquin, telling anyone who asked that this was the holy man of Uchch.

They escorted Guru Ji as far as Hehran, near Raikot, where Sikhs took over. Guru Ji sent them home with a letter of commendation, which their descendants preserved. Rai Kalha, a Muslim chief of Raikot, then sheltered Guru Ji, and it was his messenger who, the Encyclopaedia says, brought the terrible news from Sirhind.

Read this story

Note. Sri Gur Sobha's account of this journey is brief and treats it mainly as a spiritual passage.

What the sources say (3)
  • Later traditionNames Ghani Khan and Nabi Khan and the disguise in blue as the Pir of Uchch, and says their house at Machhiwara is now a gurdwara.[EoS]
  • Later traditionTells of the litter borne by the two brothers, who said they were escorting the holy man of Uch. (pp. 192-193)[Macauliffe]
  • Later traditionSays Rai Kalha of Raikot then received Guru Ji warmly, and sent a messenger to Sirhind for news of the family.[EoS]
Disputed12 or 13 December 1705, commemorated in late DecemberSirhind

The younger sons at Sirhind

Sahibzada Zorawar Singh and Sahibzada Fateh Singh refused to convert and were martyred. Mata Gujri passed away the same day. The Encyclopaedia gives both 12 and 13 December.

According to the Encyclopaedia's account, drawn from Sikh chronicles, Mata Gujri and the two boys became separated at the Sarsa. Their cook Gangu took them to his village of Kheri near Morinda. Seeing money in the saddlebag, he stole it in the night and betrayed them to the local officials, who sent them on to Sirhind. They were held in the Cold Tower of the fort.

On 9 December the boys were brought before Wazir Khan. He offered riches and honours if they accepted Islam, then threatened death, and they refused. When Sher Muhammad Khan of Malerkotla pleaded for the children, they were given more time. They spent two more winter days in the tower with their grandmother, who urged them to stand firm.

An order came on 11 December to seal them alive in a wall. Tradition says the masonry fell away when it reached their chests. The next day, as this account has it, they refused again and were put to death. Mata Gujri, nearby, passed away when she heard the news. Macauliffe has the merchant Todar Mal bring it to her, and the Encyclopaedia says he cremated all three the following day.

In the Zafarnamah, Guru Ji wrote of the four children as gone but said that the coiled cobra still held up its head.

Read this story

Note. The site does not choose between 12 and 13 December. The late-December commemoration follows the Bikrami month of Poh, which is why it falls later than either Common Era date. The entries also differ on detail: Fateh Singh's age is given as seven, or six from his birth date of 25 February 1699, Gangu is a cook or an old servant, and the arrest is dated 7 or 8 December. The imperial letter speaks of one son captured, while Sikh sources speak of two.

What the sources say (6)
  • ScholarshipGives the sentence of walling up on 11 December, execution on 12 December, cremation the next day, and a fair from 25 to 28 December.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays Fateh Singh was martyred on 12 December 1705.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipGives the same 12 December and a fair on 11-13 Poh, falling in the last week of December.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays the children were executed on 13 December 1705 and that their grandmother passed away the same day.[EoS]
  • From the timeQuotes the imperial letter on the capture of Guru Ji's mother and another son.[EoS]
  • From the timeMentions the younger sons only briefly, in lines that also mix up their names. (ch. XII, couplets 73-75; translator's introduction)[Src]

Zafarnamah, Muktsar and Damdama

December 1705 to October 1706

Guru Ji moved through the Malwa, where the Brar Jats and other warriors joined. Sainapati says Guru Ji now camped by a body of water and fought there. Guru Ji reached Talwandi Sabo, also called Damdama Sahib, on 20 January 1706, after some time in the Lakkhi Jungle, and stayed over nine months.

Mata Sundari and Mata Sahib Devan rejoined Guru Ji here, escorted by Bhai Mani Singh.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][Src]

Well attestedWritten from Dina or Kangar, late 1705 or 1706Dina, in the Malwa

The Zafarnamah

Guru Ji wrote to Aurangzeb in Persian verse, accusing him of breaking his oath.

Note. The Encyclopaedia says 1706 in one place and places it before the Muktsar fight of December 1705 in another.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeDescribes the poem of 111 stanzas, with quotations against the emperor's oath and verse 22 on the lawfulness of the sword as a last means.[EoS]
  • From the timeTells of the writing, carriage and effect of the letter, placing it after Muktsar, which the translator calls an error. (ch. XIII)[Src]
  • ScholarshipNotes that the tradition names Dina but that the letter itself mentions Kangar, 2 km away.[EoS]
Well attested1706-1707Ahmadnagar and Lahore

Aurangzeb's reply

The emperor is reported to have invited Guru Ji to meet and told Lahore to make peace, but passed away before any meeting.

Note. The Encyclopaedia's claim that the letter moved the emperor is interpretation. The translator of Sri Gur Sobha places the emperor's camp at Aurangabad, while the Encyclopaedia says Ahmadnagar.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeReports Ahkam-i-Alamgiri as saying a mace-bearer and an officer carried a farman to Munim Khan at Lahore ordering peace, and that an invitation followed.[EoS]
  • From the timeTells of a court messenger sent after the letter, which the translator says agrees with Persian sources. (ch. XIII; translator's introduction)[Src]
  • ScholarshipSays the letter touched the emperor, and has Guru Ji leave for the south on 30 October 1706.[EoS]
Well attested29 December 1705, or the first of Magh in one traditionKhidrana, later Muktsar

The forty at Muktsar

Men who had renounced Guru Ji at Anandpur came back led by Mai Bhago and fell fighting Wazir Khan's force. Guru Ji blessed them as the forty liberated ones.

According to the tradition, some forty Sikhs from the Majha left Anandpur during the siege and signed a paper disowning Guru Ji. At home their women shamed them, and a woman named Mai Bhago of Jhabal rallied them to go back and ask forgiveness.

They reached the pool of Khidrana in the Malwa just as Wazir Khan's army was closing on Guru Ji, and took up positions in front of the attackers. The Encyclopaedia's entry on Muktsar says they fixed cloths over the shrubs to look like tents. They fought hard enough that the Mughal force, short of water in that dry country, turned back.

Guru Ji came down to the field afterwards and found that all but one had attained martyrdom, and Mahan Singh lay near his end. Macauliffe says Guru Ji offered him any boon and he asked only that the paper be cancelled. Guru Ji took it out and destroyed it, and he passed away content.

Guru Ji blessed them as the forty muktas and cremated them there. The place took the name Muktsar, the pool of liberation. Mai Bhago, wounded, stayed with Guru Ji afterward as a bodyguard in men's dress, the Encyclopaedia says, and later settled near Bidar.

Read this story

Note. The fight itself is attested. Mai Bhago and the torn deed, the most loved parts of the story, are not in the passages of Sainapati read here. The annual fair on the first of Magh, around 14 January, also does not match the 29 December date.

What the sources say (4)
  • From the timeTells in about twelve lines of a camp by a pool attacked by Mughal forces, without naming the forty or Mai Bhago or telling of the pardon. (ch. XIII; translator's note)[Src]
  • ScholarshipDates the battle to 29 December 1705 and names Mai Bhago as leader of the returning forty.[EoS]
  • Later traditionTells of her rallying the deserters and being the sole survivor, with Mahan Singh passing away in Guru Ji's lap.[EoS]
  • Later traditionTells of the deed of renunciation drawn up by Sikhs of the Majha and of Guru Ji tearing it up at Mahan Singh's request, and links the place to the first of Magh. (pp. 212-214)[Macauliffe]
Agreed in tradition1706Talwandi Sabo, Damdama Sahib

The recension of the scripture at Damdama

Working under Guru Ji, Bhai Mani Singh wrote out a new copy of the scripture, with the hymns of Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji added.

Note. Sainapati's chapter on this period, as read here, gives no account of this work, and no manuscript was examined for this page. The tradition that the text was dictated was not found in the entries read.

What the sources say (4)
  • Later traditionSays Guru Ji prepared a fresh recension with Bhai Mani Singh as amanuensis.[EoS]
  • Later traditionSays a copy was made under Guru Ji's supervision, that the spot is shown to pilgrims, and that the place was known as Guru Ji's Kashi.[EoS]
  • Later traditionCalls this the final recension and repeats the same account.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipConfirms in general that Guru Ji added the hymns of Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji to the earlier volume.[EoS]

Bahadur Shah, Nanded and the passing of the Guruship

1706-1708

Guru Ji left Talwandi Sabo on 30 October 1706 heading south, and was near Baghor in Rajasthan when news came of Aurangzeb's death. Turning back towards the Punjab, Guru Ji sent a small force to help Prince Muazzam at Jajau on 8 June 1707. The two met at Agra on 23 July.

Letters dated 2 October 1707 tell Sikhs to come armed when Guru Ji reached Kahlur, so Guru Ji evidently meant to go back. Instead, Guru Ji travelled with the emperor's camp through Rajasthan and into the Deccan, crossing the Tapti in June 1708. The Tarikh-i-Bahadur-Shahi, as cited in the Encyclopaedia, says Guru Ji preached the word of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji along the way. They reached Nanded late in August 1708, and the emperor went on.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][Src]

Well attested23 July 1707Agra

The meeting with Bahadur Shah

The new emperor received Guru Ji with a robe of honour, but talks on the state's policy came to nothing.

Note. Sainapati's translator notes that his account fits with Persian sources. What the talks covered, and how far they got, is known mostly by inference.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeTells of Munim Khan bringing an invitation and of Guru Ji going to court with armed followers. (ch. XVI)[Src]
  • From the timeSays letters dated 2 October 1707 report the meeting.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipGives the date, the gifts including an aigrette, and the attendant taking the robe to camp rather than Guru Ji wearing it at court.[EoS]
Agreed in traditionFrom 3 September 1708Nanded

Banda Singh is sent north

Guru Ji met the Bairagi Madho Das, initiated him, and sent him to the Punjab with five arrows and five Sikhs.

The Encyclopaedia and Macauliffe tell a similar story. Lachhman Dev of Rajauri had once killed a doe while hunting and, moved by remorse, had left home at fifteen to become an ascetic named Madho Das. He had settled by the Godavari at Nanded and was known for his powers.

Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji came to his hermitage on 3 September 1708. By the end of their encounter he fell at Guru Ji's feet and called himself Guru Ji's banda, or slave. Guru Ji took him to the camp and gave him the rites of the Khalsa.

Guru Ji gave him five arrows from the quiver, a drum and a banner, with five Sikhs to go with him, and sent him north against the faujdar of Sirhind, who had martyred the younger sons. He reached the Punjab and took Samana on 26 November 1709.

Read this story

Note. The Encyclopaedia's entry on Banda Singh gives the new name as Banda Singh, and its entry on Guru Ji gives Gurbakhsh Singh. The later events of his rising do show someone acting on the commission, but Sainapati's silence is notable. The Encyclopaedia's entry on hill states adds the chiefs to his targets, while others mention only Sirhind and the provincial governors.

What the sources say (4)
  • Later traditionDates the visit to 3 September 1708, gives a drum, banner and five arrows, and names the five Sikhs who went with him, among them Binod Singh and Baj Singh.[EoS]
  • Later traditionSays Guru Ji gave five arrows and an escort and told him to fight the tyranny of provincial overlords.[EoS]
  • Later traditionTells of the man calling himself Guru Ji's banda, or slave, of the baptismal name Gurbakhsh Singh, and of the charge to go to the Punjab. (pp. 237-238)[Macauliffe]
  • From the timeDoes not mention him, an omission the translator discusses. (translator's introduction)[Src]
Well attestedAutumn 1708Nanded

The attack at Nanded

Two Pathans, by most accounts hired by Wazir Khan, reached Guru Ji, and one stabbed Guru Ji below the heart. Guru Ji struck back.

Sainapati and the sources that follow him say two Pathans came to Nanded and sat in the evening gathering for several days, so no one suspected them. One evening, after the Rahras prayer, they found Guru Ji alone. One of them struck Guru Ji in the left side below the heart.

Before he could strike again Guru Ji struck him down with a sabre, and his companion fell to Sikhs who rushed in. The emperor sent surgeons, including an Englishman named Cole. The wound was stitched and seemed to mend. But when Guru Ji pulled a stiff bow some days later, it opened again and bled badly, and Guru Ji did not recover.

Read this story

Note. Wazir Khan's part is an inference that the translator of Sri Gur Sobha marks with the word probably. The Encyclopaedia states it more flatly.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeDescribes the stabbing, wound and passing, and the translator adds that the assassins had been attending the congregation for days. (ch. XVIII)[Src]
  • ScholarshipCites Sainapati on the wound in the left side, names Jamshed Khan and Wasil Beg from Guru kian Sakhian, and reports surgeons including an Englishman, Cole.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays Wazir Khan hired the two, fearing the friendship of Guru Ji with the emperor.[EoS]
Well attested6-7 October 1708Nanded

The Guruship passes to the Granth and the Khalsa

Before passing away, Guru Ji ended the line of personal Gurus, with sources stressing the Granth, the Khalsa, or both.

The Bhatt Vahi Talauda, as quoted in the Encyclopaedia, tells it in a few lines. On Wednesday, 6 October 1708, at Nanded, Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji asked Bhai Daya Singh to bring the Sri Granth Sahib. Guru Ji placed five paise and a coconut before it, bowed, and told the gathered Sikhs that it was a command: they were to treat the Granth as standing in Guru Ji's place.

Sainapati remembers a different moment. A day before the end, he says, Sikhs came asking what form the Lord would now take. Guru Ji's reply was that the Khalsa was Guru Ji's own form, and that Guru Ji would dwell in the Khalsa from beginning to end.

Guru Ji passed away on the night of Kattak sudi 5, 1765 Bikrami, which the Encyclopaedia gives as 7 October 1708. There were to be no more personal Gurus. From this point authority lay with Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and with the Khalsa.

Read this story

Note. This is well attested, with different weight in different sources. The verses of Sainapati read here speak of the Khalsa as Guru Ji's form and do not name the Granth, although the translator's summary says the Guruship was vested in it. The Bhatt Vahi entry names the Granth, but it comes through a modern transcript. Scholars, as quoted by the translator, read this as a double doctrine of Guru Granth and Guru Panth. The Encyclopaedia's entry on hill states says November 1708 for the passing, which appears to be a slip for 7 October.

What the sources say (5)
  • From the timeQuotes the Bhatt Vahi Talauda for 6 October 1708, with Guru Ji having the Granth brought and placing five paise and a coconut before it.[EoS]
  • From the timeDates the passing to Kattak sudi 5, 1765 Bikrami, at night, and has Guru Ji say the Khalsa is Guru Ji's own form. (ch. XVIII, couplets 37, 41-42)[Src]
  • Later traditionSays Kuir Singh refers to the succession passing to the Granth, but dates the death to 1709.[EoS]
  • Later traditionStresses the Granth as Guru, in a work of 1769.[EoS]
  • Later traditionGives a speech telling the Khalsa to see Guru Ji in the Granth. (pp. 244-245)[Macauliffe]

Images

  • Fresco of the preparation of amrit

    A mid-1800s fresco from the Akal Takht building that stood before 1984. It imagines Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji and Mata Jito preparing amrit for the Panj Piare. Published by Kanwarjit Singh Kang in 1995.

    Unknown, c. mid 19th century. Original Akal Takht building (no longer standing). Public domain. Source

  • Painting of the ten Sikh Gurus seated in a group

    A later artist's imagining of the ten Gurus, from Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji to Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji, from the workshop of Purkhu of Kangra. No portrait from any Guru's lifetime is established.

    Purkhu of Kangra, Early 19th century. Kapany Collection (as credited on Commons). Public domain. Source

  • Gurmukhi page opening the Jap in the Anandpur manuscript

    The opening of the Jap in the Anandpur manuscript. Commons gives 1695-1696 or 1698, while Mann says it is undated but from the 1690s.

    Unknown scribes (Commons credits Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji), 1690s, undated. Private collection (per Mann, 2008). Public domain. Source

  • Fresco of Bhai Kanhaiya meeting Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji

    A fresco at Sri Khat Wari Darbar, Shikarpur, Sindh, imagining Bhai Kanhaiya meeting Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji. Commons gives only a broad date range.

    Unknown, 18th to early 20th century, uncertain. Sri Khat Wari Darbar, Shikarpur, Sindh. Public domain. Source

  • Painting of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji enthroned, with an attendant

    One of two paintings pasted into the Anandpur manuscript, showing Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji enthroned with an attendant, dated to the 1690s or early 1700s. Mann thinks artists at Anandpur made it. That it is a true likeness is not established.

    Unknown painter, 1690s or early 1700s, disputed. Private collection (per Mann, 2008). Public domain. Source

  • Painting of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji at court

    A later artist's imagining of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji, from the Pahari workshop of the family of Nainsukh of Guler, about 1815. No portrait from Guru Ji's lifetime is established.

    family workshop of Seu-Nainsukh of Guler, c. 1815. Samrai Collection, London (as credited on Commons). Public domain. Source

  • Painting of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji on horseback

    A later artist's imagining of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji on horseback, from the Guler-Kangra schools in the early 1800s. No portrait from Guru Ji's lifetime is established.

    Unknown, Early 19th century. Collection of Gursharan and Elvira Sidhu (as credited on Commons). Public domain. Source

  • Painting of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji with the Panj Piare

    A later artist's imagining of the 1699 Khalsa ceremony at Anandpur. Commons says the attribution to Gian Singh Naqqash comes from his grandson.

    Gian Singh Naqqash, Late 19th or early 20th century. Public domain. Source

  • Letter of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji

    A hukamnama of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji dated 24 July 1698. The date comes from Commons, whose source is a social media post.

    Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji and his scribe, 24 July 1698. Public domain. Source

  • Illuminated letter of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji

    An illuminated hukamnama of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji of 1699 (Samat 1756), published by Gurinder Singh Mann in 2008 from a family collection in the United States.

    Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji and his scribe, 1699. Private collection, USA (per Mann, 2008). Public domain. Source

  • Inscribed copper plate from Kapal Mochan

    The copper plate at Kapal Mochan, inscribed with a date in 1679 and naming Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji. Its use of 'Singh' and 'Khalsa' before 1699 raises questions that Mann discusses.

    Unknown maker (attributed to Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji), 1679, as inscribed. Shiva temple, Kapal Mochan (per Mann, 2008). Public domain. Source

  • Printed photograph of six old weapons in a row

    Weapons displayed at Takht Kesgarh Sahib as relics of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji, printed in Kahn Singh Nabha's Mahan Kosh of 1930. Commons names them as a spear, a musket, a khanda, a saif, a katar and a nagni.

    Kahn Singh Nabha, Before 1930. Takht Kesgarh Sahib. Public domain. Source

  • Inscribed copper plate from Naina Devi

    The copper plate shown at Naina Devi to Gurinder Singh Mann in 2000 and attributed to Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji. It is undated, and Mann places it around 1700 by genealogy.

    Unknown maker (attributed to Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji), Undated. c. 1700. Priests of Naina Devi temple (per Mann, 2008). Public domain. Source

  • Page from the Patna manuscript of the Dasam Granth

    A page of the Patna manuscript of the Dasam Granth, traditionally dated 1698. Mann questions whether this volume is from 1698 or a later copy.

    Unknown scribes (Commons credits Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji), 1698 by tradition. Takht Harmandir Sahib, Patna. Public domain. Source

  • Opening verses of the Zafarnama in an illuminated manuscript

    The opening of the Zafarnama in an illuminated Dasam Granth manuscript dated 1765, known on Internet Archive as the Patna Missal manuscript. Its origin was not independently checked.

    Patna Missal (faction of Sikhs), 1765. Public domain. Source

  • Opening page of a copy of the Zafarnama

    The opening of a copy of the Zafarnama said to have been prepared by Bhai Daya Singh. That attribution is a claim. The original letter has not been located.

    Unknown, Early 18th century, as claimed. Public domain. Source

The sources, and how far to trust them

  • Bachitra NatakBegun perhaps 1688, finished before 1699From the time

    Autobiographical poem commonly attributed to Guru Ji, covering the family's lineage, a divine commission, and battles down to about 1696. It does not mention the Khalsa, which helps to date it. It is a poem of faith and war, not a chronicle, so it records how Guru Ji understood events more than it records their details. Read here through the Encyclopaedia's summary and quotations.[EoS][EoS]

  • ZafarnamahLate 1705 or 1706From the time

    Persian verse letter to Aurangzeb in 111 stanzas, included in the Dasam Granth, accusing him and his officers of breaking an oath. Direct evidence of Guru Ji's view, and of the broken promise at Anandpur, though it is a polemic. Read through the Encyclopaedia's quotations.[EoS]

  • Sri Gur Sobha of SainapatiDated by the poet to 1701, but carries events to 1708; probably finished about 1711From the time

    Poem by a member of Guru Ji's circle, read here in Kulwant Singh's 2014 English translation. It is the closest narrative source. Its aim is praise, and its translator stresses that the poet cares more for ideals than for events. It skips the initiation scene of 1699, omits Banda Singh, mixes up the names of the sons, and gives the younger sons two lines. These gaps are themselves evidence that later scenes grew in the telling.[Src][EoS]

  • Hukamnamas1690s-1708From the time

    Dated letters of Guru Ji from 1691 onward. They confirm the ending of the masands, and letters dated 2 October 1707 report the meeting with the emperor. Read here through the Encyclopaedia's description.[EoS]

  • Ahkam-i-Alamgiri and Persian court materialEarly 18th centuryFrom the time

    Letters of Aurangzeb's secretary Inayat Ullah Khan, which confirm the fight at Chamkaur, the deaths of two sons and the emperor's response to the Zafarnamah. Hostile or official in tone, and hence valuable. Read only as quoted or described in the Encyclopaedia and by the translator of Sri Gur Sobha.[EoS][EoS][Src]

  • Bhatt VahisBardic registers; transcripts obtained in the 1950sFrom the time

    Supply many exact dates and the entry on the Guruship passing to the Granth in 1708, said to be by a bard who was at Nanded. The Encyclopaedia advises caution. Their form and script mean that outsiders cannot easily check them.[EoS][EoS]

  • A newswriter report of 1699, via Ghulam Muhai ul DinUncertainLater tradition

    Macauliffe cites a Persian historian for a newswriter's report to the emperor. Banerjee repeats it from Macauliffe. Neither the report nor the historian's text was seen for this page, and this historian has not been securely identified here, so the citation is shown as a claim, not as a checked Mughal document.[Macauliffe][Banerjee]

  • Gurbilas Patshahi 10 of Kuir Singh1751Later tradition

    The first work to detail the early years, the offering of heads and the march from Chamkaur to Talwandi Sabo. It drew on the Bachitra Natak, Sri Gur Sobha and Bhai Mani Singh. The Encyclopaedia points to wrong dates (1689 for the Khalsa, 1709 for Nanded), inflated numbers and invented travel in the south.[EoS]

  • Bansavalinama, Mahima Prakash, Gurbilas Patshahi Dasvin, Sri Gur Pratap Suraj Granth1769, 1776, 1797, 19th centuryLater tradition

    The later narrative tradition, which grows fuller as it grows later. Sukkha Singh's account of Nanded is the most detailed, but the Encyclopaedia says imagination outweighs fact in his work.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS]

  • Macauliffe, The Sikh Religion, vol. 51909Later tradition

    Retells the chronicles at length, with goats in the five heads scene, a story absent from the Encyclopaedia's account of Kuir Singh's text. Good for the story, weak as a test of it.[Macauliffe]

  • Encyclopaedia of Sikhism1992-1998Scholarship

    The main source of dates. Its entries sometimes disagree, as on 12 or 13 December 1705, and it tells some late stories in its own voice.[EoS][EoS][EoS]

Cite this page

"Life and times of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji". Sikh History: lives of the Gurus. https://sikh-history.co.uk/lives/guru-gobind-singh/