ੴSikh History

Life and times

Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji

Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji, the fifth Guru, was born at Goindwal in 1563 and led the Sikhs from 1581 until he was martyred at Lahore in 1606. In those twenty-five years Guru Ji completed the tank at Ramdaspur, raised the Harmandir Sahib within it, founded Tarn Taran and Kartarpur, and compiled the Adi Granth, the volume now honoured as Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, writing more of it than any other contributor.

This is the first Sikh life with solid evidence from outside the community. Abu'l Fazl records the emperor Akbar calling on Guru Ji in 1598. Jahangir's memoirs record the order for his death. A Jesuit report from Lahore in 1606 and the Dabistan-i-Mazahib add further outside views, and Bhai Gurdas, Guru Ji's own scribe, wrote from within the community. The manuscript known as the Kartarpur Pothi still exists.

That evidence does not settle everything. The sources disagree about why Guru Ji was martyred, how, and on what date, so they are set side by side below. The story that Mian Mir laid the Harmandir Sahib's foundation appears in no source read for this page from Guru Ji's lifetime.

Dates, family and related people →

The times

The height of Akbar's reign

For most of Guru Ji's life, the emperor was Akbar, who in the Sikh sources appears as a friendly ruler. He gave up the jizya and the pilgrim tax, curbed the ulama and promoted debate between faiths. The Encyclopaedia says that Kartarpur was founded in 1594 on land granted in his reign. Akbar spent years at Lahore in the 1590s, which brought the court close to the growing Sikh centres.

Abu'l Fazl's account of 1598 presents the visit to Guru Ji as an act of imperial grace. Grewal notes that a friendly gesture of this kind also had its politics. By this time the community was large enough for the state to take notice of it.[EoS][EoS][(eds)]

Jahangir and the orthodox reaction

Akbar passed away on 16 or 17 October 1605 (the Encyclopaedia's entries differ), and Jahangir was crowned on 24 October. The Encyclopaedia describes him as relying in his early years on orthodox courtiers influenced by Shaikh Ahmad Sirhindi of the Naqshbandi order, who wanted Akbar's religious policy reversed. That reading comes from a modern reference work, and it should be kept apart from Jahangir's own words.

Prince Khusrau broke out from Agra on 6 April 1606, with Rajput and noble backing from a faction that had hoped to see him succeed Akbar. He was caught on the Chenab on 27 April. Jahangir then came to Lahore and punished those he thought had helped. Guru Ji's case belongs among these reprisals, though the memoir itself says the emperor had been thinking of acting for some time.[EoS][EoS][EoS][EoS][Src]

A growing Sikh community

The Dabistan says that by Guru Ji's day there were few cities without Sikhs. Its author is writing some decades later, and the claim is general, but it agrees with Jahangir's complaint that many Hindus and even some Muslims were drawn to Guru Ji. Abu'l Fazl and Jahangir thus confirm from outside what Sikh sources claim from inside: the community had become noticeable in the Punjab.[Src][Src][EoS]

Show

Early life and succession

1563-1581

Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji was born on 15 April 1563 (Vaisakh vadi 7, 1620 Bk) at Goindwal, the youngest son of Sri Guru Ram Das Ji and Bibi Bhani, and so a grandson of Sri Guru Amar Das Ji. He grew up in the household that was then moving between Goindwal and the new settlement at Ramdaspur.

The Encyclopaedia describes him as religious by temperament and his father's favourite, which is hindsight to some degree. On 1 September 1581 Sri Guru Ram Das Ji passed away, and Guru Ji took up the office at eighteen. He married Mata Ganga on 19 June 1589. Their only child, Sri Guru Hargobind Ji, was born in 1595.[EoS][EoS][EoS]

Agreed in traditionc. 1580Lahore

The verses from Lahore

Left in Lahore to care for the Sikhs, the young man writes verses of longing to his father and is chosen as successor.

The Encyclopaedia gives this story in two versions. In its life of Sri Guru Ram Das Ji, a cousin named Sahari Mal asks Guru Ji to a wedding in Lahore. The two elder sons make excuses, and the youngest goes and stays on, with orders to serve the Sikhs until recalled.

Separated from his father, he sends letters in verse. Prithi Chand hides the first two. The third reaches Sri Guru Ram Das Ji and, being marked number three, reveals what has happened. On his return the young man adds a fourth stanza of joy, and his father names him successor.

Read this story
What the sources say (3)
  • ScholarshipTells of the invitation, the three letters and how Prithi Chand was found out.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipTells of the Lahore mission and the verse letters, with the sangat he founded there.[EoS]
  • Later traditionGives Sahari Mal's visit and the reasons Guru Ji could not go.[Macauliffe]

Prithi Chand's rivalry

1581-1618

The eldest son, Prithi Chand, managed the kitchen and household under his father and claimed the office by right of age. Ganda Singh's notes on the Dabistan say he seized what he held when his father passed away. He later set up a separate seat at Hehar and Kotha Guru, and his followers came to be called Minas by Guru Ji's Sikhs, a term of contempt. He passed away at Hehar in April 1618.

This rivalry had a lasting effect. His son Miharban wrote a janamsakhi, and the family went on to hold the Amritsar gurdwaras for most of the 17th century after Sri Guru Hargobind Ji left. So almost all surviving accounts of the dispute come from their opponents.[EoS][Src][EoS][EoS]

Well attestedFrom 1581Hehar and Kotha Guru

Prithi Chand as rival Guru

The elder brother sets up as a rival Guru, and Bhai Gurdas and the Dabistan both show the split.

Note. The split is secure. The Dabistan's sequence, with Prithia following Guru Ji and being called Miharban, is confused. Ganda Singh corrects it in his notes.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeThe Dabistan says that his followers treated Prithia and then Miharban as Gurus, and that the disciples of Sri Guru Hargobind Ji used a contemptuous name for them.[Src]
  • ScholarshipLists Bhai Gurdas among its sources and describes the separate seat and the name Minas.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipReports that later accounts linked Guru Ji's decision to compile scripture to a rival collection tied to Miharban.[Mann]
Agreed in traditionHehar and Lahore district

Sulahi Khan and the brick kiln

Prithi Chand wins over a Mughal officer against Guru Ji, and the officer is burned in a kiln before he can act.

Macauliffe, following the chronicles, says that Prithi Chand allied himself with Sulahi Khan, a Mughal revenue officer. When Sulahi Khan approached Ramdaspur, Guru Ji left for Wadali, where he had a large well dug. Sulahi Khan asked Prithi Chand where his younger brother had gone, and promised to deal with his conduct.

The Encyclopaedia completes the story: Sulahi Khan was on his way to attack Guru Ji when he fell by accident into a burning brick kiln and was killed.

Read this story

Note. No Mughal source for this officer's death was seen. The story has the moral shape common in these chronicles.

What the sources say (2)
  • Later traditionTells of the alliance, the departure to Wadali and the officer's meeting with Prithi Chand.[Macauliffe]
  • ScholarshipCalls him Sulhi Khan and describes his accidental death in a kiln.[EoS]
Agreed in traditionc. 1595 onwardWadali

The attempts on the infant

Prithi Chand is said to have tried to have the infant poisoned after the birth of Sri Guru Hargobind Ji.

Note. Written by his opponents' descendants, and there is no way to check this. The birth of a son would have ended Prithi Chand's hopes, so the rivalry itself is credible.

What the sources say (3)
  • ScholarshipSays the child escaped poisoning by a jealous uncle and a cobra thrown in his way.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays that plots to poison the child failed and that Prithi Chand then withdrew to Hehar.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays the Gurbilas describes Prithi Chand's hostility at length and his open enmity after the birth of a son.[EoS]
Well attested19 June 1595Wadali

The birth of Sri Guru Hargobind Ji

After years without a child, Mata Ganga gives birth to a son, and Guru Ji's hymns give thanks.

The Gurbilas, as summarised in the Encyclopaedia, credits the birth to a blessing from Bhai Buddha. Mata Ganga brought food out to him one day, and he ate it while promising her a warrior son who would crush tyrants.

Read this story

Note. The birth is secure. Bhai Buddha's blessing is a later story and shows signs of being shaped by what the son became.

What the sources say (3)
  • ScriptureNotes hymns of thanksgiving in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji that reflect the household's joy at the birth.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipGives the date and the place as Wadali.[EoS]
  • Later traditionAttributes the birth to Bhai Buddha's blessing and his promise of a warrior son.[EoS]

Building: the Harmandir Sahib, Tarn Taran and Kartarpur

1581-1604

Guru Ji's first task was finishing the tanks at Ramdaspur. Macauliffe says he sat each day under a shisham tree to oversee the work. Santokhsar and Ramsar were also completed and the town was extended. Guru Ji invited traders to settle, a continuation of his father's policy.

The Harmandir Sahib was given a door on each of its four sides. The Encyclopaedia explains this as a sign of openness to all castes, which is an interpretation and not a recorded statement of Guru Ji's intention. Guru Ji also travelled through Majha, sinking wells and helping during a famine. The Encyclopaedia says the baoli at Lahore is his work. Tarn Taran followed from 1590, Kartarpur in 1594, and the settlement at Sri Gobindpur may also date from this time.[EoS][EoS][EoS][Macauliffe][EoS]

Disputed1588 or 1589Amritsar

The foundation of the Harmandir Sahib and Mian Mir

Popular tradition says the Sufi Mian Mir laid the foundation; the sources for this are late, and Macauliffe says Guru Ji laid it.

Here is who says what. Ghulam Muhayy ud-Din, known as Bute Shah, in his Twarikh-i-Punjab, says that the Sufi travelled to Amritsar when Guru Ji asked him, and set a brick on each of four sides and another at the tank's centre. Sohan Lal Suri's Umdat-ut-Twarikh has Guru Ji go to Lahore and ask Mian Mir for help with the buildings. Giani Gian Singh's Twarikh Guru Khalsa of 1896 says plainly that Mian Mir laid the foundation.

The Encyclopaedia calls the date of 28 December 1588 (1 Magh 1645 Bk) current tradition. Macauliffe gives the same Bikrami date, converts it to 1589, and says Guru Ji himself laid the first brick. He adds that a mason knocked it out of place, and that Guru Ji said the foundation would have to be laid again, which he connects with Ahmad Shah's destruction of the temple. Gupta tells the mason story but gives the foundation and the saying to Mian Mir.

Read this story

Note. None of the named sources is close to 1588. Two were printed in 1885 and 1896, and the third is cited from an undated manuscript. Nothing read for this page from Guru Ji's lifetime mentions the story. It may preserve a memory of real goodwill between the two men, or it may reflect the value later writers placed on the idea. The Mian Mir entry's doubt about the life spans is itself odd, since he was born in 1550 and Guru Ji in 1563, and it is given here as the source states it.

What the sources say (5)
  • ScholarshipQuotes Bute Shah, Sohan Lal Suri and Giani Gian Singh, and describes the cornerstone by Mian Mir as current tradition.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays Sikh tradition is inclined to claim a long friendship, which their life spans will not support, and that he is said to have laid the stone.[EoS]
  • Later traditionSays Guru Ji laid the first brick, with no part for Mian Mir at the foundation.[Macauliffe]
  • ScholarshipAccepts the foundation by Mian Mir on 28 December 1588, and gives him the saying about the temple being rebuilt.[Gupta]
  • ScholarshipCites Bute Shah and Gian Singh for the cornerstone.[EoS]
Agreed in tradition1590-1596Tarn Taran

Tarn Taran and the seized bricks

Guru Ji builds a tank at Tarn Taran, and a local official takes the bricks for an inn.

The Encyclopaedia says that on 13 April 1590 Guru Ji began to turn a natural pond by the Delhi-Lahore road into a square tank, buying the land from the people of Khara. Digging ended on 19 March 1596, and building started on Sri Darbar Sahib.

Then a local official, Nur ud-Din, claiming imperial authority for a new roadside inn, seized the bricks and the kilns that were making them and sent his son to carry them away. Sri Darbar Sahib stayed unbuilt for generations. In 1768 Sardar Budh Singh took the district, tore down the inn and carried the bricks back. Lepers are said to have come to the site, and Guru Ji is remembered as caring for them.

Read this story
What the sources say (3)
  • ScholarshipGives the dates, the seizure by Nur ud-Din and the return of the bricks in 1768.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays the land was acquired from Khara residents, and mentions care for lepers.[EoS]
  • Later traditionGives the same bricks story and the date 1590, explaining the name as a raft across.[Macauliffe]
Agreed in tradition1594Kartarpur (Jalandhar)

Kartarpur in the Jalandhar Doab

Guru Ji founds a town between the Beas and Sutlej on land granted in Akbar's reign.

Note. Not to be confused with the Kartarpur on the Ravi founded by Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji. No copy of a grant was seen.

What the sources say (2)
  • ScholarshipDates the foundation to 1594, on land granted in Akbar's reign, and describes the wooden pillar relic.[EoS]
  • Later traditionTells of the foundation and the well there.[Macauliffe]
Well attestedAcross the Punjab

The masands and the tenth share

Representatives collect a tenth of Sikhs' income and bring groups to Guru Ji each year.

Note. The Dabistan describes the system decades later and not necessarily as it was in Guru Ji's day. The Encyclopaedia's other entries date the term or function earlier. By the time of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji, the same office was charged with corruption and abolished.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeThe Dabistan describes masands bringing their followers' offerings and leading them to Guru Ji, who gives each a turban on leaving.[Src]
  • ScholarshipCredits Guru Ji with the first masands, each chosen for piety, with deputies and yearly visits to Guru Ji.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipDescribes the tenth share and the Sikhs' title for Guru Ji, the True King.[EoS]

Akbar and the Sikhs

1598-1605

The visit of 1598 is the first event in Sikh history recorded in a Mughal chronicle. It fell during Akbar's departure from Lahore. The other Akbar story of this period, about a complaint against the scripture, comes only from Sikh sources, and they cannot agree on where or when it happened.[(eds)][EoS][EoS]

Well attestedNovember 1598Near Goindwal

Akbar calls on Guru Ji

Abu'l Fazl records the emperor alighting at Guru Ji's house while crossing the Beas.

The Akbarnama gives only a short notice, in Moosvi's translation. The emperor crossed the Beas on an elephant near Goindwal while his troops used a boat bridge. On that day he stopped at Guru Ji's house, accepting the invitation because it came from true devotion. Abu'l Fazl calls Guru Ji the leader of a Brahmanical faith, a slip that the editors explain by noting that he was not in camp at the time.

Sikh writers, as reported in the Encyclopaedia, add that Guru Ji asked for relief for peasants after a failed monsoon, and that Akbar cut the land revenue.

Read this story

Note. The dates conflict: 4 November in the Akbarnama translation against 24 November in the Encyclopaedia and Gupta. The translators also point out that the Akbarnama reports the reduction later and as cancelling an earlier increase, and says nothing of a plea by Guru Ji. So the visit is firm, and the revenue link is a later Sikh addition.

What the sources say (4)
  • From the timeAbu'l Fazl dates the crossing and the visit to 13 Azar, given as 4 November 1598. (Text 1, p. 55)[(eds)]
  • ScholarshipGives 24 November 1598 and says Guru Ji's plea led to remission of the year's revenue.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipGives November 1598 and a 10 to 12 per cent reduction in Punjab revenue at Guru Ji's request.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipGives 24 November 1598.[Gupta]
Disputed1596-97, or 1605Kartarpur or Batala, or Gurdaspur

The complaint against the Granth

Rivals tell Akbar that the scripture insults Islam. Bhai Buddha and Bhai Gurdas read it to him and he makes an offering.

In the Encyclopaedia's telling, opponents complained to Akbar that the book spoke against Islam and other faiths. He called for it while camped at Batala, and Guru Ji sent Bhai Buddha and Bhai Gurdas with the volume. Akbar pointed to a place, the book was opened at random, and the hymn read out praised God, and the others tried did the same. He gave 51 gold mohars for the Granth and robes of honour for the two Sikhs and Guru Ji.

Macauliffe tells this with Chandu as the instigator, and has him insist that someone else who could read Gurmukhi should check the reading.

Read this story

Note. The 1596-97 date comes before the Granth was finished in 1604, unless it refers to material in progress. No Mughal source for this was found in the sources read.

What the sources say (4)
  • ScholarshipPlaces Akbar at Batala and says the visit to Goindwal came earlier.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipInstead has Bhai Gurdas recite to Akbar at Kartarpur in 1596-97, with Prithi Chand behind the complaint.[EoS]
  • Later traditionPlaces the complaint at Gurdaspur and blames Chandu.[Macauliffe]
  • ScholarshipDates Akbar's stay at Batala to 1605.[Gupta]

Compiling the Adi Granth

c. 1600-1604

Guru Ji's compilation is the central achievement of his life. Hymns by the five Gurus and by fifteen Bhagats and Sufis, including Kabir, Sheikh Farid and Ravidas, were arranged in thirty ragas in a set order. Bhai Gurdas wrote out the text at Guru Ji's direction, at Ramsar near Amritsar, according to the chronicles.

Why it was done is less clear. The usual view is that Guru Ji wished to protect the hymns from false compositions by rivals, and Mann reports that later writers connect this with the Minas. The Mahima Prakash gives a saying: as the Panth has appeared, so there must be the Granth. Scholars differ on how much of this the sources can prove.[EoS][Mann][EoS][EoS]

DisputedGoindwal

Baba Mohan and the Goindwal Pothis

Guru Ji sings beneath Baba Mohan's window until he comes down with the old manuscripts, in a story with a contested basis.

The later chronicles, as the Encyclopaedia and Mann describe them, say that Baba Mohan, son of Sri Guru Amar Das Ji, kept the old hymn collections at Goindwal and would not part with them. Bhai Gurdas was turned away, and then Bhai Buddha. So Guru Ji went himself, and sat in the street below the upper room with a tambura, singing to his uncle. Baba Mohan came downstairs with the books.

The Gurbilas adds a jewelled palanquin carried by Sikhs, with Guru Ji walking barefoot behind it because the books were the light of his predecessors. Mann shows that the later versions add a vision of Sri Guru Amar Das Ji warning him of the rough welcome.

Read this story

Note. The Pothis exist. Whether Guru Ji used these particular volumes as his main source is argued over, and the street scene appears only in later chronicles.

What the sources say (4)
  • ScholarshipTells of the refusals, the tambura and the surrender of the books.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipFollows the Gurbilas on the palanquin and the barefoot walk to Amritsar.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipShows how the tale grows from Mahima Prakash to the 19th-century texts, and reports Sahib Singh's rejection of it as against Teja Singh's acceptance.[Mann]
  • ScholarshipSays that Sikh tradition has Guru Ji obtain the Pothis, and describes differences between their text and order and the final Granth.[EoS]
Well attestedTo 1 August 1604Ramsar, Amritsar

Writing the volume at Ramsar

Bhai Gurdas writes the text from Guru Ji's dictation and notes the date at the head of the index.

Note. The Encyclopaedia describes the volume as having 974 leaves. Dictation is what the chronicles report. Mann's reading of the manuscripts points to a more complex process that drew on older written sources.

What the sources say (3)
  • From the timeReports Bhai Gurdas's note on the manuscript, placing the end of the writing at Bhadon vadi 1, 1661 Bk, or 1 August 1604.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays he was Guru Ji's chief helper and wrote the entire text.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipUses the name Kartarpur Pothi or Bhai Gurdas Pothi and gives 1604 as its date.[Mann]
Agreed in tradition16 August 1604Harmandir Sahib, Amritsar

Installation in the Harmandir Sahib

Bhai Buddha carries the Granth on his head, Guru Ji follows with a whisk, and the first reading is taken.

The Gurbilas, as quoted by the Encyclopaedia, says that Guru Ji lay awake thinking about who should take charge of the Granth and settled on Bhai Buddha. At dawn the whole sangat walked from Ramsar, with Bhai Buddha bearing the volume on his head and Guru Ji behind him waving the whisk over it, while musicians sang.

In the inner sanctuary Bhai Buddha opened the book for the first time. The hymn that came up gave thanks for a task completed and for the tank full of nectar. Guru Ji directed that the book should rest each night in his own room, and slept on the floor beside it.

Read this story

Note. The day comes through a late chronicle, though it fits Bhai Gurdas's note of 1 August. The Encyclopaedia's sources and Gurbilas are not independent of each other.

What the sources say (3)
  • ScholarshipGives the date, the procession, the first reading and the night-time custom, following the Gurbilas.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipGives the same date and names Bhai Buddha as first granthi.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipConfirms his appointment to the office on that day.[EoS]
Agreed in tradition1604Lahore and Khara Mangat

Bhai Banno's copy

Sent to Lahore to have the volume bound, Bhai Banno travels slowly and has it copied on the way.

As the Encyclopaedia retells the Gurbilas, Guru Ji told Bhai Banno to take the book to Lahore for binding. He asked to show it first to the Sikhs of his village, and Guru Ji agreed, on the condition that he stayed no more than one night in any place.

Nothing was said about how fast he should travel. So he had paper bought, moved at about five miles a day and had his companions write through the days and nights. He added some apocryphal text as well. When he came back with two bound volumes, Guru Ji took only the one in Bhai Gurdas's hand.

Read this story

Note. A Banno manuscript exists. The trick with the journey is a later story.

What the sources say (3)
  • ScholarshipTells the full story and says Bhai Banno added apocryphal texts to his copy.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays he prepared his copy on the journey and that Guru Ji returned it to him.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipCalls this manuscript the Kanpur Pothi, a first copy reported in Mahima Prakash and Bhagatmala, with differences of organisation from the Kartarpur Pothi.[Mann]
DisputedAfter 1635Kartarpur (Jalandhar)

The Kartarpur manuscript

The volume passes to Dhir Mall's family at Kartarpur, where it remains, and scholars debate its exact status.

Note. Family custody has limited close examination, which is why claims about it are hard to test. Mann's reassessment does not deny its importance, but does change how it should be described.

What the sources say (4)
  • ScholarshipSays Dhir Mall kept the original recension when Sri Guru Hargobind Ji left Kartarpur in 1635.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays the volume went to Kartarpur in 1634 and has stayed with that family.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipProposes to revise the common view of the Kartarpur Pothi as the original attempt at a collection, and shows other manuscripts and a text already in circulation.[Mann]
  • ScholarshipSays his descendants still hold the copy made under Guru Ji's direction.[EoS]
Agreed in traditionAmritsar

The musicians Balvand and Satta

Two court musicians quarrel with Guru Ji over offerings, are later forgiven, and compose the Var that enters scripture.

Mahima Prakash and later chronicles, as summarised in the Encyclopaedia, tell how Balvand and Satta asked for all the Vaisakhi offerings of one year to pay for a family wedding. Guru Ji agreed, but the takings fell short, and they demanded more. When he refused they walked out, sure that the congregation would melt away without them, and spoke rudely of the house of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji when he came to them.

They were shunned, and the story says they fell ill with leprosy. A Sikh named Laddha pleaded for them. They were forgiven and cured, and their Var followed.

Read this story

Note. This reports what the chronicles say about the illness and cure, and the site does not assert or deny them. The Var itself is not evidence for the quarrel.

What the sources say (2)
  • ScholarshipGives the full quarrel, Laddha's plea and the composition of the Var.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipDescribes Guru Ji's inclusion of their Var in the Granth as an honour, without the quarrel.[EoS]

Khusrau, Jahangir and the martyrdom

1605-1606

Prince Khusrau fled Agra on 6 April 1606 and made for the Punjab. He was caught on the Chenab on 27 April and later blinded. On his way through the Beas region he met Guru Ji, and what happened at that meeting became the immediate occasion for the emperor's order.

Guru Ji was brought to Lahore and was martyred there in May or June 1606. The Encyclopaedia gives 30 May 1606 (Jeth sudi 4, 1663 Bk). This is the point in the record where outside sources are strongest, and also where they disagree most clearly with each other and with the Sikh chronicles. The accounts are therefore laid out side by side in the episodes below.

Whatever the immediate cause, the Sikh community took this as a turning point. It is at the root of the change seen under Guru Ji's son. A gurdwara called Dehra Sahib was raised in the 18th century on the Ravi side at Lahore.[EoS][EoS][Src][Src][(eds)]

Well attestedApril 1606Goindwal or Tarn Taran

Khusrau's meeting with Guru Ji

Sources agree that the prince and Guru Ji met, but not on where or what took place.

Jahangir says that Guru Ji came out to meet Khusrau where he had halted, told him things and marked his forehead with saffron, a sign considered lucky. Guerreiro, relaying Jesuit reports, turns this into a coronation: Guru Ji congratulated the prince on his new royal state and placed a tiara on his head.

The Mahima Prakash is modest by comparison: the prince was in trouble, Guru Ji gave him the hospitality of the kitchen, and he went on the next morning. Macauliffe has the prince ask for money at Tarn Taran, and has Guru Ji give him five thousand rupees. The Dabistan says only that Guru Ji had prayed for his welfare.

Read this story

Note. Ganda Singh doubts the meeting took place at all, pointing out that the Mahima Prakash has Guru Ji at Tarn Taran rather than Goindwal, and that the report reached Jahangir late. Most writers accept a meeting and differ on its meaning. The saffron mark is the disputed act: to Jahangir and the Jesuits it signified royal approval, and to Sikh writers it was at most a blessing.

What the sources say (5)
  • From the timeJahangir says Guru Ji came out to the prince and marked his forehead with saffron. (pp. 72-73)[Src]
  • From the timeGuerreiro says Guru Ji congratulated the prince and placed his tiara on him. (Appendix to Text 2)[(eds)]
  • From the timeThe Dabistan gives prayer for the prince's welfare as the reason for the arrest; Ganda Singh's note argues the report is unreliable and possibly made up.[Src]
  • ScholarshipQuotes the Mahima Prakash on one night's hospitality and suggests Tarn Taran as the place.[EoS]
  • Later traditionSays the prince visited at Tarn Taran and received 5,000 rupees for his journey.[Macauliffe]
Well attestedMay-June 1606Lahore

Why Guru Ji was condemned: Jahangir's own words

The emperor writes that he had long wanted to end Guru Ji's mission or convert him, and used the Khusrau incident.

Jahangir writes of Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji with open disrespect, as a Hindu at Goindwal dressed as a holy man, who had won over simple Hindus and even foolish Muslims. They called him Guru. For three or four generations, the emperor says, they had kept this shop going, and he had often thought of stopping it or of bringing Guru Ji into Islam.

When he heard of the Khusrau meeting, he ordered Guru Ji brought before him, gave his houses and children to Murtaza Khan and confiscated his property. Then comes the order of death.

Read this story

Note. The phrase 'with tortures' is not found in Rogers and Beveridge and is an interpretation of the Persian term yasa. Grewal suggests the emperor may have meant a form of death that did not shed blood. The dating is also disputed: Moosvi notes that the passage comes right after a promotion dated 22 Muharram (30 May 1606), while the Encyclopaedia dates the entry to 19 June.

What the sources say (4)
  • From the timeGives the emperor's contempt, his long-standing wish and the order for confiscation and death. (pp. 72-73)[Src]
  • From the timeMoosvi's translation renders the sentence as capital punishment and notes that the Persian terms could point to a bloodless Mongol-style killing. (Text 2, pp. 55-57)[(eds)]
  • ScholarshipQuotes it as death with tortures and argues that this makes religious motive the real cause.[Src]
  • ScholarshipDates the entry to 22 Safar 1015 AH, or 19 June 1606, and gives its own translation, execution by state policy and law.[EoS]
Disputed1606Lahore

The fine: the Dabistan and the Jesuits against Jahangir's silence

The Dabistan and Guerreiro speak of a heavy fine and death under torture by those collecting it, but Jahangir mentions no fine.

In the Dabistan, Guru Ji was arrested and fined for praying for Khusrau, and could not pay the huge sum demanded. He was held in the sandy tract of Lahore, where the summer heat and the torments inflicted by the collectors killed him.

Guerreiro's account of Jesuit reports is similar in outline but adds a wealthy Hindu who stood surety for a hundred thousand crusados. When the money did not come, this man stripped Guru Ji of his goods and, in the Moosvi summary, subjected Guru Ji to torture until martyrdom.

Jerome Xavier wrote from Lahore on 25 September 1606, in a letter quoted by the Encyclopaedia, that their good Pope had been overcome by suffering, torment and dishonour.

Read this story

Note. Ganda Singh argues that the fine is a mistaken report, perhaps caused by the fine levied on Amba in the next lines of the Tuzuk. Moosvi instead treats the Jesuit and Dabistan reports as agreeing with each other against the Tuzuk. Macauliffe says Guru Ji refused to pay and forbade Sikhs to collect the money, which contradicts the Dabistan's statement that Guru Ji was unable to pay and matches the Sikh view that the penalty was illegitimate. The questions remain open.

What the sources say (4)
  • From the timeThe Dabistan names the fine, the desert heat and the bailiffs' tortures as the cause of death. (pp. 13-14)[Src]
  • From the timeGuerreiro has a wealthy Hindu surety who takes all of Guru Ji's possessions and inflicts the suffering. (Appendix to Text 2)[(eds)]
  • From the timeQuotes Father Xavier's letter of 25 September 1606 on the suffering of Guru Ji.[EoS]
  • From the timeRecords confiscation and death with no mention of a fine; the next entry concerns a fine on someone else. (pp. 72-73)[Src]
DisputedLahore

Chandu Shah in the Sikh accounts

Sikh chronicles blame a slighted Khatri official whose offer of his daughter for marriage had been refused.

The chronicles, as the Encyclopaedia and Macauliffe tell it, say that Chandu Shah, a wealthy Lahore banker and revenue official, was looking for a husband for his daughter. A family priest proposed young Sri Guru Hargobind Ji. Chandu agreed, but said Guru Ji's house was beneath his own. Macauliffe's version has him compare his own house to an upper storey and Guru Ji's to a gutter.

Word of this reached the sangat in Delhi. They asked Guru Ji to refuse the match, and he did. Chandu became his enemy, and when Jahangir arrived in Lahore he used his chance. In this account Chandu takes over the sentence from Murtaza Khan and oversees the tortures personally. Macauliffe has him still pressing for the marriage at the end.

Read this story

Note. No outside source read for this page names Chandu. The Encyclopaedia's own entries differ in weight: the Chandu Shah entry follows the chronicles, while the life of Guru Ji plays down his role.

What the sources say (4)
  • ScholarshipGives the marriage insult, the refusal and his alleged role in the torture, attributing the last to Sikh chronicles.[EoS]
  • Later traditionTells the marriage negotiations at length and has Chandu as Guru Ji's keeper.[Macauliffe]
  • ScholarshipCalls him a Hindu Khatri official but judges that he hardly had the influence to cause the death, and puts the cause on the emperor.[EoS]
  • From the timeDoes not name Chandu; hands the houses and children to Murtaza Khan. (pp. 72-73)[Src]
Disputed30 May 1606Lahore

The ordeal at Lahore and the Ravi

Sikh tradition says Guru Ji endured hot iron, burning sand and boiling water, and passed away in the Ravi.

The Encyclopaedia summarises the Sikh account. Guru Ji was held for several days on a platform outside Lahore fort, near the Ravi. He was seated on red-hot iron, burning sand was poured over him and he was plunged into boiling water. Macauliffe gives speeches and hymns at each stage, and the offer of life if the Granth were changed to include praise of Muhammad and the Hindu gods.

Mian Mir came and offered to appeal to the emperor, but Guru Ji stopped him, telling him to accept God's will. In Macauliffe's version, Guru Ji explains his suffering as an example to others. At last he was taken to bathe in the cold river, and his blistered body could not bear it. Wrapped in meditation, he passed away.

Bhai Gurdas, who knew him, uses images from nature: the fish in the water, the moth in the flame, the deer that hears only the hunter's bell. The verse does not describe torments in detail, but it does speak of the hour of suffering.

Read this story

Note. That Guru Ji suffered and passed away in custody is supported by the Dabistan, the Jesuits and Sikh memory. The exact torments are given in detail only in later accounts. Jahangir mentions none of them. The end of the body is also uncertain: one Encyclopaedia entry has it cremated, and another has it given to the water. The date is also uncertain. The Encyclopaedia and Ganda Singh give 30 May, while Moosvi says the traditional Sikh account points to June.

What the sources say (6)
  • From the timeIdentifies Bhai Gurdas as a contemporary and kinsman, and the Vars as his composition.[EoS]
  • From the timeQuotes the verse in which he says Guru Ji knew only the divine word in his hour of pain. (Quoting Bhai Gurdas, Var 24, pauri 23)[EoS]
  • Later traditionGives the fetters, the sand, the caldron, the Mian Mir conversation and the speeches. (pp. 91-100)[Macauliffe]
  • From the timeThe Dabistan agrees on heat and torment, in brief terms, and places them in the sands of Lahore.[Src]
  • ScholarshipNames five Sikhs as witnesses who cremated Guru Ji and returned to Amritsar.[EoS]
  • ScholarshipSays Mata Ganga's body was consigned to the river because her husband's had been, not burned.[EoS]
Single account1606

Reactions: Sirhindi's letter

A letter by Shaikh Ahmad Sirhindi rejoices at the death, which some modern writers treat as a sign of orthodox pressure.

Note. This shows his view, and it was read only as quoted by the Encyclopaedia. It does not prove that he influenced Jahangir, which is the Encyclopaedia's inference. Jahangir's memoir does not mention him here.

What the sources say (1)
  • From the timeQuotes his Maktubat for the words 'the accursed kafir of Goindwal' and describes him as jubilant.[EoS]

Images

  • Painting of the ten Sikh Gurus seated in a group

    A later artist's imagining of the ten Gurus, from Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji to Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji, from the workshop of Purkhu of Kangra. No portrait from any Guru's lifetime is established.

    Purkhu of Kangra, Early 19th century. Kapany Collection (as credited on Commons). Public domain. Source

  • Lithograph of Gurdwara Dera Sahib, Lahore

    Gurdwara Dera Sahib, Lahore, marked as the samadh of Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji. From Syad Muhammad Latif's book on Lahore, 1892.

    Syad Muhammad Latif, 1892. Public domain. Source

  • Detail of embroidered fabric from a palanquin

    Embroidery from the palanquin that, by tradition, carried the Goindwal Pothis to Amritsar and back. Kept at Gurdwara Chaubara Sahib, Goindwal. The date on Commons is a suggestion.

    Unknown, Late 16th or early 17th century, by tradition. Gurdwara Chaubara Sahib, Goindwal. Public domain. Source

  • Fresco of Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji with Bhagats and Bhai Gurdas

    A mid-1800s fresco at Gurdwara Baba Bir Singh imagining Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji compiling the Adi Granth with Bhai Gurdas, with the Bhagats present. The Bhagats lived in earlier centuries, so the gathering is symbolic.

    Unknown, c. mid 19th century. Gurdwara Baba Bir Singh (as stated on Commons). Public domain. Source

  • Painting of Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji, the fifth Guru

    A later artist's imagining of Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji, from a set of the first nine Gurus painted about 1800-1840. No portrait from Guru Ji's lifetime is established.

    Unknown, c. 1800-1840. Royal Collection Trust, RCIN 925206 (as credited on Commons). Public domain. Source

  • Reproduced Gurmukhi pages from the Kartarpur manuscript

    The Mul Mantar and end of the Ragamala from the Kartarpur manuscript, as reproduced by G.B. Singh in a book of 1950.

    Reproduced by G.B. Singh (Gurbaksh Singh, 1877–1950) from the Khalsa Samadar of Amritsar, c. 1604. Reproduced 1950. Sodhi family, Kartarpur. Public domain. Source

  • Small photograph of the Kartarpur manuscript

    A small photograph of the Kartarpur manuscript. Commons gives no photographer. Access to this volume has been restricted, so few images exist.

    Bhai Gurdas, scribe, under Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji, c. 1604. Sodhi family, Kartarpur. Public domain. Source

The sources, and how far to trust them

  • Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, Jahangir's memoirsEntry made in 1606From the time

    The decisive contemporary source, written by the man who gave the order. It is hostile and contemptuous, but it states his long-held wish to end Guru Ji's mission or convert him, and names the blessing of Khusrau as the occasion. Translations differ in a way that matters. Rogers and Beveridge say only that he was to be put to death. Ganda Singh and the Encyclopaedia add 'with tortures'. Moosvi renders it as capital punishment and explains the Persian terms siyasat and yasa in a note.[Src][(eds)][Src][EoS]

  • Dabistan-i-MazahibMid-17th centuryFrom the time

    An outsider's study of religions by an author who knew the sixth and seventh Gurus. Traditionally ascribed to Mohsin Fani, it is now attributed by scholars to Zulfiqar Ardastani. It is close to these events, not eyewitness for them. On Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji it gives a story of an unpaid fine, which its translator Ganda Singh rejects in his notes. It is sympathetic in tone and has errors, such as treating Prithi Chand and Miharban as one person.[Src][EoS][(eds)]

  • Jesuit reports (Jerome Xavier and Guerreiro)1606 and shortly afterFrom the time

    Independent outside witnesses, from Lahore and the Mughal court. They have no reason to favour either side, but they understand Sikh matters through Christian terms, calling Guru Ji a pope. Xavier was read only through the Encyclopaedia's quotation, and Guerreiro through the appendix in Grewal and Habib.[EoS][(eds)]

  • Bhai Gurdasc. 1551-1636From the time

    Guru Ji's kinsman and scribe of the Kartarpur Pothi. His Vars are a devotional witness and speak of Guru Ji's calm in suffering, but do not give a chronicle of events. Read here through the Encyclopaedia's quotation.[EoS][EoS]

  • The Kartarpur Pothi and related manuscripts1604From the time

    The surviving manuscript and its index note, as described by Mann and the Encyclopaedia, are the best evidence for the compilation. Mann argues against treating it as the first attempt at a Sikh text, since earlier manuscripts such as the Goindwal Pothis stand behind it. The manuscript itself was not seen for this page.[Mann][EoS]

  • Mahima Prakash, Gurbilas Chhevin Patshahi, Suraj Prakash1776 and early to mid 19th centuryLater tradition

    The narrative stories about Prithi Chand, Chandu Shah and the fetching of the Pothis come from these. The Gurbilas claims the date 1718, but the Encyclopaedia doubts this and Mann places it in the 1840s. Mann shows how the stories grow more elaborate over time. Read here through the Encyclopaedia, Mann and Macauliffe.[EoS][EoS][Mann][EoS]

  • Macauliffe, The Sikh Religion, vol. 31909Later tradition

    The longest English account, following the later chronicles closely. Its speeches are chronicle writing and not reports of what was said. It gives no credit to Mian Mir for the foundation, which matters for that dispute.[Macauliffe]

Cite this page

"Life and times of Sri Guru Arjun Dev Ji". Sikh History: lives of the Gurus. https://sikh-history.co.uk/lives/guru-arjun/